Nakuru, April 2012
The reality of gender violence in Kenya is horrid! The
silence in which sexual violence is shrouded is unwittingly annoying and
disturbing.
The accounts are
well written
On their faces,
in their eyes
Engraved in their
hearts and soul
The hurt is
overwhelming
But, hush! Their
lips remain sealed
The voice long
gone – a distant hollow
The road to
justice, overgrown
I recently made such a trip to
Nakuru to conduct a mapping exercise of all stakeholders working on gender
based violence in the district. Naturally, my visit would call for interactions
with the police, health workers, social workers, the judiciary, counsellors, legal
aid workers and many others including the provincial administration.
As you could imagine, there has been a lot of blame-game in
this field: the police blame the healthworker and vice versa, the chief blames
the police, the public point an accusing finger towards everybody else when
cases fail to yield justice. Usually, there are a lot of feelings of
compromise. As a partner, we find ourselves in this mix. Our work, therefore,
is to support coordination mechanisms that will see the survivor/victim access
justice while also looking at approaches to prevent gender based violence. In doing
this, we hope to minimize cases of lack of evidence, withdrawal of cases,
non-reporting or even the chiefs taking up arbitration. Educating the public on
the sexual offences act, what to do in case of violation and where to report is
core to our work. As well, training of stakeholders on collection, diagnosis
and preservation of evidence is key to pleading a case in the corridors of
justice.
Back to my Nakuru assignment: At the Filadelfia women and
girls shelter I met happy women who have been supported towards economic
empowerment. Different groups engage in different income generating activities
such as beading and jewellery making, basket weaving using waste paper,
crotchet work and environment friendly cooking fuels. Almost all groups’
members have passed through the shelter but found alternatives and moved on but
still continue with their groups’ activities.
I was informed that the shelter provides a home for women and girls who
have faced gender based violence. The shelter provides accommodation for up to
six months while the survivors find alternatives. During their stay, they get
affiliated to the different activities and groups around the shelter.
Then, the most heart-rending accounts of sexual and gender
based violence started trickling in:
Case A:
A person with disability has been married to a woman who has
no disability. The man has turned to battering his wife accusing her of all
manner of misgivings. The woman does not retaliate for fear of being accused of
cruelty to a disabled person. The man uses his crutches as a hitting stick.
When the neighbours could not take it any longer, one took
the matter up with the area chief. Through the chief’s intervention, the
survivor reported the matter to the police (Child and Women Protection Unit).
The police are carrying out investigations.
Case B:
Tired of disagreements with her husband, Maria (not her real name) packed her
little possessions and left her matrimonial home. Trudging on her mother’s skirt
was 15 year old Nima (not her real name)
looking frustrated but happy to leave their home. However, Maria left her
younger children (daughter and son) under the care of her beastly husband.
Sunset after sunset drew by without any sign of Maria’s return. The husband
turned his frustrations onto his daughter – a beautiful 12 year old. Suddenly,
and without warning, Juli (not her real
name) started spending nights of misery under her father’s belly. She cried
her heart out but there was no one to hear her – her younger brother watched
helplessly.
When Juli’s teacher got wind of the goings on, she
approached a community based organisation of trained paralegals and reported
the matter. The community paralegals swung into action. Together with the
police at the child protection unit, the paralegals got a vivid account of
Juli’s misery. They took her to the Gender Based Recovery Centre (GBVRC) where
tests were carried out and a medical report produced to affirm the claims.
To nab the culprit, the police kept Juli in custody and
asked the teacher to refer the beastly dad to the police should he come calling
at the school. The plan fell in place when Juli’s dad showed up at the school
looking for his daughter who was not home and her brother had no idea of Juli’s
whereabouts. The teacher suggested that the matter be reported to the police so
that a search can be mounted.
Without wasting time, Juli’s father rushed to the police to
report his missing daughter. The police locked him up and produced him in court
on charges of defilement. The medical report and a witness account from Juli’s
brother were enough to sign off the perpetrator to a ‘gallows’. He earned 20 years at Kamiti Maximum without
an option of a fine thanks to the Sexual Offences Act. He should thank his gods
that the charges were erroneously framed under section 8 of the sexual offences
act, i.e. defilement, earning him a lesser term. Had he been rightfully charged
for incest under section 20: “...
guilty of incest and shall be jailed for 10 years or more. However, if the
victim of incest is below 18 years, then the accused person shall be jailed for
life.”
According
to the District Gender and Social Development Officer, Mrs Monica Wegulo, the
most vulnerable in gender violence situations are the children. Being the Coordinator
of the GBV working group, Mrs Wegulo said the network group has greatly
facilitated coordination of key actors leading to expeditious handling of GBV
cases.
No comments:
Post a Comment